Dos de los periódicos estatales principales de China amontonaron el desprecio sobre las elecciones presidenciales de EE.UU. el sábado, diciendo que la corriente interminable de escándalos que rodean a ambos candidatos principales mostró que los Estados Unidos no tenían derecho de sermonear a otros en la democracia.
China con frecuencia se queda resentido por la crítica extranjera de su sistema político unipartidista, en particular de los Estados Unidos, y dice que ningún país tiene el derecho de intentar y obligar China a cambiar un sistema que China dice que mejor se adapta a la situación de China.
En un comentario, el diario People’s Daily calificó las elecciones de Estados Unidos de “caos”, apuntando a cuestiones relacionadas con los impuestos del candidato republicano Donald Trump y la controversia sobre el uso de los correos electrónicos privados de la rival democrática Hillary Clinton y preocupaciones sobre su salud.
“WikiLeaks recientemente prometió revelaciones significativos sobre la elección de Estados Unidos, guerra, armas y petróleo en las próximas semanas. Se cree que estas revelaciones añadirá más llamas al espectáculo político ya caótico.” comentó el diario.
“Ambos candidatos hicieron más ataques personales que la discusión de las cuestiones, como pueden ver de su primer debate presidencial.” dijo el periódico People’s Daily.
“Toda esta rareza no sólo claramente muestra el dilema del establecimiento político estadounidense sino también apunta directamente a las prácticas corruptas del sistema político estadounidense.” añadió en el comentario.
“Durante mucho tiempo, los Estados Unidos se ha alardeado de cómo su elección extremadamente animada es un signo de la superioridad de su sistema e incluso ha utilizado esto para criticar intencionadamente la gran mayoría de los países en desarrollo,” dijo el periódico.
El articulo completo de People’s Daily:
Commentary: U.S. presidential election chaos exposes flawed political system
As the presidential candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties begin the lastsprint toward the general election, U.S. citizens are becoming more and more frustrated bythe political campaign.
WikiLeaks recently promised “significant” disclosures on the U.S. election, war, arms andoil in the coming weeks. It is widely believed that these revelations will add more flames tothe already chaotic political show.
Scandals have dogged the two main candidates throughout the 2016 election, which has further increased dissatisfaction among U.S. citizens. According to a recent Gallup poll, 60percent of registered voters view Donald Trump as the least favorable candidates in 25years, and Hillary Clinton as the second least favorable.
The tax-related questions for Trump, as well as worries over Clinton’s health and her use of a private email server, have all led to the current state of the election. In their first presidential debate, the two candidates focused more on personal attacks than policies.The Times commented in an editorial that the candidates have neglected the widening gap between the American dream and social reality.
A recent survey showed that voters now perceive the government and congress as the biggest problems needing to be addressed in American society. These concerns come ahead of issues like the economy, employment and immigration. Of course, that doesn’t mean voters don’t care about economic and social issues, but it does show the great and growing concerns that U.S. citizens have about their political system.
Despite protests against money-oriented politics and election scandals, Trump still plans to drop another $140 million on campaign ads. Anticipated to cost as much as $5 billion,most of which comes from special interest groups, the 2016 election is likely to be the most expensive one in history.
People are very clear about the sour fruits of money-oriented politics, and the new U.S.president is unlikely to end political confrontation or even do much to ease discontent toward the government. As British economist Martin Wolf said, growing inequality and slowing productivity have made democracy intolerant and capitalism illegitimate.
For a long time, the U.S. has boasted that its lively election is a sign of its system’s superiority. However, the essential purpose of the election is to provide a driving force for development. The most important task for presidential nominees is not to win the election, but to eventually govern the country.
It’s time for the U.S. to take a close, honest look at its arrogant democracy and flawed politics.
This article is edited and translated from 美国选举乱象凸显制度弊端 Source: People’s Daily
